Is this a video course?

No. This is an interactive, slide-based learning platform. Each lesson has rich text, animated diagrams, live code editors, and quizzes. You learn by reading, interacting, and doing, not by watching videos passively.

How long do I have access?

Forever. Both pricing tiers are one-time payments with lifetime access. This includes all current 766 lessons and any future content we add.

What level of experience do I need?

None. We start from absolute basics like 'What is latency?' and build up to distributed consensus protocols. The Foundation level assumes zero prior knowledge of system design.

How much does the system design course cost?

7.99 US dollars for lifetime access globally, or 499 Indian rupees for lifetime access in India. One-time payment, no subscription, no hidden fees. 11 lessons are free with no signup required.

What technologies are covered?

Everything from DNS and load balancers to Kubernetes, Kafka, distributed databases, consensus protocols, stream processing, security architecture, and observability. We cover principles and real-world implementations used at Netflix, Google, Amazon, Uber, Stripe, and more.

Is this useful for system design interview preparation?

Yes. The lessons are structured around the exact topics asked in system design interviews at FAANG and top-tier companies. Interactive diagrams help you practice whiteboard-style explanations. Covers everything from URL shortener design to distributed payment systems.

How is this different from ByteByteGo or Educative?

766 interactive lessons (4x more than most competitors), 16 different diagram types that build step by step, real production examples from Netflix, Google, Amazon, Uber, and Stripe, and lifetime access for a one-time payment of $7.99 instead of annual subscriptions costing 100 to 200 dollars per year.

Your team proposes to stop prompt injection by running a classifier that blocks inputs containing attack phrases like 'ignore previous instructions.' Why is this insufficient on its own?

Input is open natural language, so an attacker can reword, translate, encode, or split the instruction until it slips past, and one that gets through is enough, A classifier is a probabilistic filter over an infinite space of phrasings. It catches the obvious payloads, which is why it demos well, but attackers can paraphrase, encode, or hide the instruction. EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711) started by defeating exactly Microsoft's XPIA classifier. Input filtering is one thin layer, never the wall.

In the dual-LLM pattern, what is the single rule that makes a successful injection of the quarantined model harmless?

The model that can call tools never reads untrusted text, and the model that reads untrusted text has no tools and cannot act, The privileged planner sees only the trusted request and symbolic variables, so there is nothing in its context to hijack it. The quarantined reader processes untrusted content but holds no tools, so injecting it only returns bad data into a variable. Separating the ability to act from the exposure to untrusted text is what contains the attack.

Why does CaMeL have the privileged model emit a fixed plan as code before any untrusted data is fetched, rather than improvising step by step?

So the control flow is fixed from trusted input alone and untrusted data can never change what the program does; the interpreter then enforces capabilities on each tool call, CaMeL derives the plan from the trusted query up front, so no data that flows back later can alter the control flow. A custom interpreter runs the plan and tags every value with its provenance as a capability, checking capabilities before each tool call so untrusted data cannot reach a sensitive sink. On AgentDojo it solved 77 percent of tasks with provable security versus 84 percent undefended.

For the exfiltration leg of the trifecta, why is an egress allow-list preferred over a denylist of known-bad domains?

A denylist must name every bad domain and fails against a freshly registered one, while an allow-list refuses everything not explicitly approved, so an unknown exfiltration domain is blocked by default, You cannot enumerate every malicious domain, and attackers register new ones on demand, so a denylist always trails the threat. An allow-list enumerates the few destinations the agent legitimately needs and denies the rest, which means a novel exfiltration URL is blocked precisely because it is unknown. Pair it with stripping remote markdown images and links to close the zero-click channel.

Defending Against Prompt Injection: The Layered Playbook

Name: System Design Masterclass
Availability: InStock

in Security

This lesson is part of the ML Platform Engineering course. Unlock the full course, a separate one-time payment, for lifetime access.

One-time payment. Lifetime access. No subscription.

Global

$20/lifetime

One-time payment via PayPal

Get Lifetime Access

5 Foundation lessons free, try before you buy

India Special

India

₹999/lifetime

One-time via UPI, cards, or net banking

Get Lifetime Access

5 Foundation lessons free, try before you buy

“The interactive diagrams alone are worth way more than the price.”

Anish K., Senior Engineer at a Bengaluru startup

Every ML Platform lesson, Foundation to Advanced

Real architecture diagrams with real tool logos

MLOps, LLMOps, and data engineering in depth

Quizzes with instant feedback

Built and reviewed by senior engineers

Lifetime access, all future content included

The first 5 Foundation lessons of this course are free, no payment needed. Try them now